Crypto Presale Due Diligence: 12 Essential Checks Guide

Yara Fernandez
Yara Fernandez
Crypto Regulation & Policy Press Release Expert
Published 2026-05-13
Updated 2026-05-13
Crypto Presale Due Diligence: 12 Essential Checks Guide Article Image

A systematic 12-check due diligence framework takes 60-90 minutes per project and eliminates the most common costly mistakes. Applied consistently, it separates disciplined investors from FOMO speculators. Here is the complete process.

Team Checks (1–3)

1. Identity: Google each founder. LinkedIn profiles must predate the project by years. Reverse image search profile photos. No prior verifiable history = immediate disqualification.

2. Track record: Have they shipped working products? GitHub contributions to prior projects? Crypto credentials go back further than the current project?

3. Advisers: Do named advisers publicly confirm involvement on their own channels? Unverifiable advisers are often listed without consent.

Technology Checks (4–5)

4. Audit: Published report from a recognised firm (Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin, Halborn, CertiK)? Critical/High findings resolved (not "acknowledged")? Verify at the firm's website, not just the project's claim.

5. Working product: Active GitHub (commits in last 30 days, multiple contributors)? Testnet or mainnet users? Empty or private GitHub = red flag.

Tokenomics Checks (6–8)

6. FDV vs comparables: IDO price × total supply = FDV. Compare to 5+ working comparable protocols on DeFiLlama at equivalent stage. Over 3× comparables = expensive.

7. TGE float: Under 5% circulating at TGE = severe 12-36 month dilution risk. Healthy: 15-25% with gradual vesting.

8. VC quality: Named VCs appear in their own official portfolio pages? Tier 1 backing (Paradigm, a16z, Multicoin) is the strongest third-party quality signal.

Market Checks (9–10)

9. Problem-solution fit: One sentence: why would users switch from the existing solution to this? No clear answer = weak positioning.

10. Liquidity plan: 20-40% of raise to locked DEX liquidity (UniCrypt, 12+ months). Under 10% = immediate trading risk.

Platform Checks (11–12)

11. Community quality: 50+ messages read across 3 days in Telegram/Discord. Technical discussion and critical thinking signal organic community vs. shill-only groups.

12. Launchpad vetting: Platform applies quality standards (DAO Maker under-5% acceptance) vs. permissionless listing (anyone can launch)?

For the fraud protection guide extending this checklist, see our crypto fraud protection guide. For the smart contract audit guide covering check 4 in depth, see our smart contract audit guide. For the FDV guide covering check 6, see our FDV guide.

Glossary

DYOR
Do Your Own Research — the standard crypto disclaimer emphasising independent research over influencer tips or community hype.
Problem-Solution Fit
The alignment between an articulated real-world problem and a protocol's proposed solution — foundation of sustainable protocol value.
TGE Float
The percentage of total token supply circulating at Token Generation Event — determines initial dilution risk from future vesting unlocks.

Disclaimer

Important: Passing all 12 checks reduces but doesn't eliminate investment risk. This guide is educational only. CryptoPresaleNews.com is not a licensed financial advisor.

Yara Fernandez
Yara Fernandez Crypto Regulation & Policy Press Release Expert
521+ articles
1 Year experience
Regulation specialty

Yara Fernandez dives into NFT drops, Latin American crypto art, and GameFi projects that bridge culture and blockchain. As a respected name in crypto journalism, she delivers valuable insights on NFT and Web3 topics from around the world. Her work blends deep research with simplicity, making it easy for readers to understand the fast-moving world of crypto. She focuses on topics related to NFT and Web3 reporting and regularly covers emerging trends, technology updates, and community stories.

✍️ WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
Frequently Asked Questions

Have questions? We have answers!

Due diligence is systematic research before investing — verifying 12 key areas: team identity (verifiable, prior work), team track record (shipped products), adviser credibility, smart contract audit (recognised firm, critical findings resolved), working product/GitHub, FDV vs. comparables, TGE float, VC backing, problem-solution fit, liquidity plan, community quality, and launchpad vetting. Takes 60-90 minutes per project. Separates disciplined investing from FOMO speculation.
Team verification: (1) search each founder name on Google — do they appear independently of this project?, (2) LinkedIn — profile predates the project by years with genuine employment history?, (3) GitHub — contributions to prior projects (genuine developers have visible history)?, (4) Twitter/X — engagement history in their claimed domain before this project?, (5) reverse image search profile photos (fake accounts often use stock photos). Anonymous team with no prior verifiable history = disqualify immediately.
Audit verification: (1) find the published audit report link (GitHub or project docs — should link to actual PDF/hosted report), (2) search the project on the audit firm's own website (CertiK Skynet at skynet.certik.com has a public directory), (3) verify the audited contract address matches the deployed address on Etherscan, (4) read the severity findings — Critical or High issues listed as 'acknowledged' rather than 'resolved' is a serious red flag. Never accept an audit claim without verifying the actual published report.
FDV = IDO price × total token supply. Example: $0.10 IDO price × 1 billion total supply = $100M FDV. Then compare: find 5-10 comparable working protocols on DeFiLlama (same sector), check their current FDV. If comparable protocols average $50M FDV, your $100M FDV IDO is paying 2× premium for an unproven project. Under 1× comparable average = potentially fair. Over 3× = expensive regardless of marketing narrative.
Low TGE float danger: under 5% circulating at TGE means 95%+ of supply unlocks over the next 12-36 months. Example: 3% TGE float, $5M market cap = $167M FDV. For market cap to stay at $5M while 97% more supply hits the market, organic demand must absorb 32× the initial supply. This math rarely works without extraordinary growth. Healthy TGE float: 15-25% with gradual remaining vesting over 24+ months.
VC verification steps: (1) find the VC's official portfolio page (a16zcrypto.com, paradigm.xyz, etc.) and search for the project, (2) check the VC's Twitter for a public investment announcement, (3) verify announcements were made by the VC, not just claimed by the project. Tier 1 VCs (Paradigm, a16z, Multicoin, Dragonfly) conduct extensive technical due diligence. Their verified participation is the strongest third-party quality signal available to retail investors.
GitHub quality signals: active recent commits (within last 30 days), multiple contributors (not just one person), meaningful commit messages (not 'updated file'), test files present, documentation with clear README, contract addresses linking to deployed verified contracts. Red flags: empty repository, all commits from one day (fake activity), private repository claiming 'working product', last commit months ago, single contributor. Genuine technical development has a visible public history.
Community quality assessment: read 50+ messages across 3 consecutive days in Telegram and Discord. Healthy signals: technical questions about protocol mechanics, critical tokenomics discussion, developers responding to bug reports, community helping each other. Warning signals: only price talk and moon emojis, critical questions deleted by admins, bot-like identical responses, no substantive discussion about how the product works.
Liquidity commitment benchmarks: 20-40% of raise to initial DEX liquidity locked 12+ months = healthy standard. Under 10% creates immediate post-TGE slippage risk for any meaningful exit. Verify: check UniCrypt (app.uncx.network) after TGE to confirm locked liquidity as promised. Discrepancy between promised and actual liquidity allocation is an integrity signal that matters for the entire team's trustworthiness.
Time allocation: team checks (20-30 min), technology checks (15-20 min), tokenomics checks (15-20 min), market and community checks (15 min total). Total: 65-85 minutes per project for standard research. For larger investments ($1,000+): add 30-60 minutes reading the full whitepaper and deeply checking comparable protocol metrics. If you can't invest 90 minutes of research time per project, either invest smaller amounts or stick to vetted launchpads that do the vetting for you.
TelegramBanner header
Have Questions?

Our team will answer all your questions. We ensure a quick response.

Contact Us