• Home
  • Crypto News
  • Telegram TON ICO: The $1.7 Billion Token Sale and Its Aftermath

Telegram TON ICO: The $1.7 Billion Token Sale and Its Aftermath

Yara Fernandez
Yara Fernandez
Crypto Regulation & Policy Press Release Expert
Published 2026-05-13
Updated 2026-05-13
Telegram TON ICO: The $1.7 Billion Token Sale and Its Aftermath Article Image

The Telegram TON ICO is one of the most instructive case studies in crypto history: the largest private ICO ever raised by a legitimate technology company, halted by the SEC before a single public token was distributed, and ultimately resulting in a community-rebuilt blockchain that became one of the most active Layer-1 ecosystems of 2024-2026. Understanding the TON ICO history explains both the regulatory landscape for large ICOs and how decentralised communities can recover from failed official launches.

The Telegram Gram ICO (2018–2019)

Between January and March 2018, Telegram raised $1.7 billion from 175 sophisticated private investors in two tranches via SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) agreements. The capital was intended to fund development of the TON (Telegram Open Network) blockchain and the Gram token — positioned as a payment currency native to Telegram's 400 million+ user base. The raise was the largest private ICO in history at that point.

Why the SAFT Structure Was Used

SAFT agreements are investment contracts where accredited investors provide capital now in exchange for tokens at a future delivery date. The SAFT structure attempted to comply with Regulation D — treating the investment contract (SAFT) as a security while arguing that the delivered tokens (Gram) would be sufficiently decentralised to constitute commodities rather than securities at delivery. The SEC disagreed.

SEC Intervention (October 2019)

On October 11, 2019 — days before the planned Gram token distribution — the SEC obtained emergency restraining orders in the Southern District of New York, halting the distribution. The SEC's core argument: the Gram tokens, even when delivered via the SAFT structure, remained investment contracts (securities) at the time of delivery because buyers still expected profits from Telegram's efforts.

Key outcome: Telegram could not distribute Gram tokens in the US or to US persons anywhere globally without SEC registration.

Settlement and Refunds (2020)

In June 2020, Telegram settled with the SEC: returning approximately $1.22 billion to investors (77 cents per dollar invested) and paying an $18.5 million penalty. Telegram abandoned the TON blockchain project entirely — the Foundation dissolved.

The Community Rebirth: The Open Network

After Telegram's abandonment, the developer community forked and continued the TON blockchain independently, rebranding it as "The Open Network" — keeping the TON name and technical architecture but removing Telegram Foundation control. The Open Network:

  • Launched mainnet independently in 2021
  • Adopted Telegram's wallet integration (Telegram re-engaged as a partner rather than controller)
  • Grew to 46M MAU by 2024-2025, driven by Telegram's Tap-to-Earn game ecosystem
  • STON.fi and DeDust as primary DEXs
  • Toncoin (TON) became a top-15 cryptocurrency by market cap

For context on the TON network as a presale ecosystem, see our TON presale guide. For the first ICO that predated the Telegram raise, see our first ever ICO guide. For how SAFT agreements work and their legal status, see our biggest ICO scams guide for the contrast with legitimate but blocked ICOs.

Lessons for Presale Investors

  • Even $1.7B legitimately raised cannot guarantee token delivery in a regulatory environment without clear rules
  • SAFT structures are not legally bulletproof — the SEC's "sufficient decentralisation" test is fact-specific and unpredictable
  • Community determination can rebuild projects even after official abandonment
  • Investors received 77 cents per dollar back — real capital was protected, unusually, because the SEC acted before retail distribution

Glossary

SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens)
An investment contract where accredited investors provide capital for future token delivery, structured as a Reg D security with the expectation tokens will become non-securities at delivery.
Emergency Restraining Order
A court order issued immediately without full hearing — used by the SEC to halt the Telegram token distribution on extremely short notice before it could complete.
The Open Network
The community-rebuilt TON blockchain continuing development after Telegram's abandonment, now a major L1 ecosystem integrated with Telegram's user base.

Disclaimer

Important: The Telegram TON case represents a unique regulatory situation. Current US regulatory posture toward ICOs is different from 2019. This article is historical and educational only. CryptoPresaleNews.com is not a licensed legal advisor.

Yara Fernandez
Yara Fernandez Crypto Regulation & Policy Press Release Expert
521+ articles
1 Year experience
Regulation specialty

Yara Fernandez dives into NFT drops, Latin American crypto art, and GameFi projects that bridge culture and blockchain. As a respected name in crypto journalism, she delivers valuable insights on NFT and Web3 topics from around the world. Her work blends deep research with simplicity, making it easy for readers to understand the fast-moving world of crypto. She focuses on topics related to NFT and Web3 reporting and regularly covers emerging trends, technology updates, and community stories.

✍️ WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
Frequently Asked Questions

Have questions? We have answers!

The Telegram TON (Telegram Open Network) ICO raised $1.7 billion in private SAFT agreements from 175 accredited investors in early 2018. It was the largest private ICO in history, intended to fund the TON blockchain and Gram payment token for Telegram's 400M+ users. The SEC blocked token distribution in October 2019, leading to a settlement where Telegram refunded $1.22B and paid an $18.5M penalty.
The SEC obtained emergency court orders arguing Gram tokens remained investment contracts (securities) even when delivered via SAFT, because buyers still expected profits from Telegram's ongoing development efforts — satisfying the Howey Test. The SEC's position: 'sufficient decentralisation' to become a non-security had not been achieved. Telegram settled without admitting wrongdoing, refunding investors and paying penalties.
SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) is an investment instrument where accredited investors provide capital now in exchange for tokens at a future delivery date. The SAFT itself is a security (Reg D compliant); the legal theory is that delivered tokens will be sufficiently decentralised to be non-securities. The Telegram case challenged this framework — the SEC argued tokens remained securities regardless of delivery mechanism.
Telegram returned approximately $1.22 billion to investors — representing approximately 77 cents per dollar invested. The refund came from the June 2020 settlement with the SEC. Investors received substantial capital protection, unusually, because the SEC intervened before public token distribution — retail investors were never exposed since the raise was private (accredited investors only).
Independent developers forked the TON blockchain code and continued development after Telegram's June 2020 abandonment, rebranding as 'The Open Network' while keeping the TON acronym. The community maintained the technical architecture designed by Telegram's engineers. Telegram later re-engaged as a partner (Telegram Wallet, ton.org promotion) without resuming the controller role that attracted SEC scrutiny.
The Open Network (TON) became one of the fastest-growing L1 ecosystems of 2024-2026. Driven by Telegram's Tap-to-Earn game phenomenon (Notcoin, Hamster Kombat reaching tens of millions of players), TON reached 46M+ monthly active users in 2024-2025. Toncoin (TON) became a top-15 cryptocurrency by market cap. Primary DEXs: STON.fi and DeDust.
The Telegram case (SEC v. Telegram Group Inc.) established that: (1) SAFT structures do not automatically make delivered tokens non-securities, (2) the 'sufficient decentralisation' test is highly fact-specific and not guaranteed by SAFT design, (3) emergency injunctive relief can halt distributions immediately without full trial. The case significantly chilled 2019-2020 ICO activity and pushed many projects to structure US exclusions.
No retail investors were harmed because the entire $1.7B raise was private (175 accredited institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors). The SEC acted before any public token distribution. This is the opposite of most ICO fraud cases — Telegram was not fraudulent, the SEC blocked what would have been a compliant (from Telegram's perspective) secondary distribution.
Toncoin (TON) is the native cryptocurrency of The Open Network blockchain. It's used for gas fees, staking, and as the primary payment currency within the Telegram ecosystem. TON was distributed by the community (not Telegram) after the project's revival. It trades on all major exchanges. Telegram integrated TON as the basis for its in-app wallet and Fragment username marketplace.
STON.fi and DeDust are the two primary decentralised exchanges on The Open Network (TON) blockchain. STON.fi is the leading AMM DEX; DeDust is its main competitor. New presale tokens launching on TON will typically create initial liquidity on one of these platforms at TGE. Both support TON's Jetton token standard (TON's equivalent of ERC-20).
Telegram's 900M+ monthly active users (2025) provide the largest built-in distribution network of any L1 blockchain. The Telegram Wallet (built on TON) enables one-click crypto transactions within the app. Tap-to-Earn games built on TON reached tens of millions of players in 2024. This built-in distribution makes TON-native presale projects accessible to audiences that wouldn't typically engage with crypto.
Original SAFT investors received $1.22 billion in refunds (77 cents per dollar) when Telegram settled with the SEC. Some investors were disappointed at the capital loss; others considered the 77-cent return reasonable given the circumstances. Notably, the refunded capital was held in cash and BTC — which appreciated significantly between the 2018 raise and the 2020 refund. Some investors effectively broke even or profited on the BTC portion.
Reg D private SAFT raises continue — many crypto projects still raise from US accredited investors via SAFT. The difference is: post-2026 regulatory environment requires more careful legal structuring and more realistic expectations about when/whether tokens qualify as non-securities. Projects now routinely exclude US persons from public token sales even after private US-accredited rounds, and legal analysis of 'sufficient decentralisation' is more rigorous.
The TON whitepaper was written by Telegram's lead technical team (primarily Nikolai Durov, brother of Telegram founder Pavel Durov). It described an innovative sharded blockchain architecture with several technical innovations including instant hypercube routing, infinite sharding paradigm, and a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus mechanism. The technical design was considered sophisticated and became the foundation for the community's continued development.
Notcoin and Hamster Kombat are Tap-to-Earn games built on TON, embedded in Telegram. Players tap their screens to earn in-game points later convertible to tokens. Notcoin's NOT token listed in May 2024 with one of the largest initial user bases of any token launch ever. Hamster Kombat (HMSTR) followed with 300M+ registered players. Both attracted hundreds of millions to the TON ecosystem and demonstrated Telegram's unique distribution capability for blockchain projects.
TelegramBanner header
Have Questions?

Our team will answer all your questions. We ensure a quick response.

Contact Us